|
IF ANY POLITICAL
candidate had an opponent who was trailing in the
polls with only 42 percent support, while the incumbent was garnering
over 54 percent, the race would be declared all but over. The political
obituaries would already be written for the contender, who was destined
to be defeated.
And yet, that is precisely the position ObamaCare finds itself in
today.
The most recent Rasmussen poll finds 54 percent opposed to the radical
legislation, with only 42 percent favoring it. In fact, every single
Rasmussen poll since September 13-14 has had opposition polling at 50
percent or greater, and support for the bill has not risen above 46
percent for almost two months.
If ObamaCare were a candidate running for public office, its
political obituaries would already be written.
The most recent gauging of public opinion was after Senate and House
Democrats presented their final versions of the legislation. But nobody
has yet written the bill’s political obituaries. No matter how opposed
the American public is to this abomination, which could cost over $2.1
trillion over ten years once fully implemented, its ghoulish progenitors
insist on keeping it alive.
(Article continues below ads. Please note that Perspicacity Press does not necessarily endorse these ads.)
Politico’s Jeanne Cummings writes that the bill is “inexorably”
making its way through Congress. “Ready or not,”
writes the Hill’s Jared Allen and Mike Soraghan, “House Democratic
leaders say they are pushing for a healthcare vote this week.” In other
words, Congress is Hell-bent on making government-run socialized
medicine the law of the land.
Of course, floor votes on ObamaCare in both chambers have been “all
but inevitable’ since before the August recess. The deadline for voting
has been pushed forward so many times that even astute observers have
lost count—and none will be surprised if it is pushed into next week or
the week thereafter. Why?
Quite simply, because Barack Obama, Nancy Pelosi and Harry Reid do
not yet have the votes they need. Now, the question that should be asked
of the troika as to on when a vote might be is, “How about never?”
And the people asking that question should be the members of Congress
who have as much at stake, with the 2010 election cycle imminent. Said
ALG President Bill Wilson last week, “Members of Congress are now faced
with the ultimate moral dilemma: Do they represent the people of their
districts, who do not want their health care taken over by government,
rationed, and watered-down, nor their taxes raised, the budget broken,
and Medicare cut to pay for it? Or do they represent Nancy Pelosi, who
does want all of those things?”
In short, will members represent the will of their constituents, or
those of the political elite in Washington who seek to force their will
upon the American people?
One thing is for certain. If there was any propensity for members to
listen to the people and show some spine in opposing the political
establishment’s unsustainable expansion of government, the outcome of
this legislation would not be in doubt. The political obituaries of
ObamaCare would already be written. And that, in the final analysis is
precisely how it should be.
|